(no subject)
Jun. 14th, 2006 01:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So this poll only took me ten years to do up. Holy shit, y'all. I thought no one was going to respond. I thought I was going to have to pad it out heavily with pictures of my own choosing. Yow.
THINGS I LEARNED FROM MAKING THIS POLL
I'm sure I learned other things of interest, but I can't think what they are now. To the poll!
[Poll #747968]
(Btw, my apologies to a couple of you - once again, I decided to keep the poll humans-only. I think
kristenb615 was looking for nominations for a poll awhile back that was meant to be pictures of anything sexy, not just people...)
ETA: Yes, I did vote for damn near everybody in that poll. THEY'RE HOT.
ETA2: Btw, sorry about the weird appearance of that second-to-last guy. My computer was having some difficulty reading the grayscale info in the picture and it was very hard to distinguish him from the background, so I quickly upped the contrast between his head and the background - but I did it pretty sloppily. He doesn't really have those odd angles at the back of his skull, I promise.
THINGS I LEARNED FROM MAKING THIS POLL
- No one seems to know exactly what "conventionally attractive" and "unconventionally attractive" mean.
- A lot of you seem to think that if you find someone attractive, they're probably conventionally attractive to some extent. I think this demonstrates that you underestimate yourselves.
- Guys have an easier time of it than girls do when it comes to conventional attractiveness, I think. Not that we didn't already know this. But it strikes me that while all the guys whose pictures were submitted are fascinating-looking and generally very hot, a lot of them do have a smaller-than-Brad-Pitt's-but-still-relatively-sizeable fan base that recognizes their attractiveness. That wasn't as common among the girls, particularly the older women. It seems like irregular or unusual features in a guy are often considered unique and appealing, whereas on a girl they're more likely to be considered ugly. This only really seems to break down for guys who are "wimpy" or "dorky" looking. Or fat. Oddly, I don't think that slender/fine-boned guys quite get classed as wimpy or dorky solely on account of their slenderness or fine bones, even though you'd expect those features to be identified as effeminate, and I think this is because of the Adonis archetype. Also, I'm making all of this up, but it's fun. Also also, not being a straight girl or a gay guy, I guess I can't really speak as authoritatively as one would like about what the conventional standards for guys are. So feel free to tell me if I'm totally wrong.
- It's hard to find good-quality high-res photos of people who are not conventionally attractive on the Internet.
- So I really really wish the version of Photoshop that I have at work had a Smart Sharpen feature.
- This poll was neat to make because it actually did sort of refresh my mental palate and help me to fall into an alternate universe where fat and wrinkles and asymmetrical features &c. aren't hideous. Like, the first time I looked at the picture of that fat guy from Lost, I went "ew". Not admirable, but it was a visceral, unconsidered reaction. After looking at him for awhile, and then looking at the rest of the pictures for awhile, and then looking back at him? He's kinda sexy. Neat.
- Alfre Woodard is OMFG SO FUCKING HOT. OMGDROOL. The hair put me over the top.
- Opinions diverge wildly on what "conventionally attractive" means. I totally thought Alan Rickman was conventionally attractive, but at least one of you didn't, and seriously, I am so not the supreme arbiter of cultural standards of beauty. I would have done a separate question asking "which of these people, if any, do you think is conventionally attractive?" if it wouldn't have meant making a poll that contained 120 images omg.
- Writers are hot.
I'm sure I learned other things of interest, but I can't think what they are now. To the poll!
[Poll #747968]
(Btw, my apologies to a couple of you - once again, I decided to keep the poll humans-only. I think
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
ETA: Yes, I did vote for damn near everybody in that poll. THEY'RE HOT.
ETA2: Btw, sorry about the weird appearance of that second-to-last guy. My computer was having some difficulty reading the grayscale info in the picture and it was very hard to distinguish him from the background, so I quickly upped the contrast between his head and the background - but I did it pretty sloppily. He doesn't really have those odd angles at the back of his skull, I promise.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 05:46 pm (UTC)I wanted to vote just for her, because Bea rocks my socks.
(And I am sad there was no Miss Piggy. She's partly human- she's half hand...)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 05:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 05:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 05:53 pm (UTC)Hee. But familiarity has SO much to do about whether we find people attractive or not. Because, y'know, they've done studies et al, but you only realise how true it is when you're going through a list like this and genuinely finding the people you've seen several times before more attractive than the unfamiliar faces.
Even though Bebe is always going to be hot. :D
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 07:54 pm (UTC)2. Yes, dude, Bebe will always be hot.
3. DID I MENTION J ALFRED PRUFROCK?!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 05:56 pm (UTC)How can I vote 6000000 times for Hugh Laurie??
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:00 pm (UTC)(....I blame you for the fact that I just said "rocked my socks.")
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:16 pm (UTC)What I'd love, when you have another million hours free, is a poll of non-famous people only Becayse when they're all famous people, you (or I, anyway) don't think 'oh, there's a cute guy', you think 'oh, there's Stephen Fry'.
But he's cute, so....
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:ICON
From:Re: ICON
From:Re: ICON
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:18 pm (UTC)also, who's that completely bald chick two down from Patti? she's GORGEOUS!
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:22 pm (UTC)What is your icon from?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:28 pm (UTC)Also - ooh, Hugh Laurie. I don't care if he may technically be old enough to be my dad, he's hot. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 06:13 am (UTC)WHAT?
*cries* Nooooooo.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:46 pm (UTC)Ahem.
Unless half the people didn't realise they were the same chap. Also you are really missing out not knowing who Stephen Fry is. You would like him. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:55 pm (UTC)And I second the comment about pre-blonde Janeane Garofalo.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 07:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:02 pm (UTC)My life was fun a few weeks ago. =D
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:08 pm (UTC)Who is the white haired lady? (the 20th picture)
And Angela Lansbury is awesome too.
I voted for a lot of people.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:28 pm (UTC)Then you get the cultural bits mucking around with the biological. Specifically, beauty for both genders is related to wealth. Once upon a time being kinda chunky was attractive because only the wealthy could afford to eat that much. Nowadays the cheap food is high in fat and sugar, and only the wealthy people can afford the time to work out enough to stay thin.
And I may have had more to say, but Mom called in the middle of that.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:39 pm (UTC)Hrm.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 01:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 01:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 11:22 pm (UTC)To some extent, I think it may have been influenced by what I already know about these people. It would be interesting, as another commenter noted, to do a similar poll with photos of people who are not famous.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 08:28 am (UTC)If we're monosexual, are we supposed to vote for who we think is attractive on both sexes anyway? Because I suspect that most monosexuals would vote who they were viscerally attracted to for the one sex, and 'conventionally attractive' for the other.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 12:28 pm (UTC)YOU STUPID INCONSISTANT...!! BAH!
P.S. Yay Bebe!